Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Friday, December 29, 2017

Love For Sale in Acapulco


Love Has Many (Familiar) Faces (1965)  


Lana Turner, stood against a process screen, is gored by a bull. This may be your idea of unforgettable. It is certainly mine. At left is an ad I clipped from The Charlotte Observer in 1965. Something told me even then that this was not a sort of picture they would be making much longer. Lana Turner in a swimsuit and drawing on a cigarette put me on notice that here was adult entertainment. There was also the little box at lower right about Lana's "Million Dollar Wardrobe By Edith Head," this back when fashion in films still meant something. Women not working outside the home would attend matinees of Love Has Many Faces, sometimes in groups, this occasional relief from bridge parties or garden clubs. Most of that would crash down by decade finish, as did themes like Love Has Many Faces explored. It was shot in Acapulco and Mexico City, those aspects sold hard. Men and women of the cast had to buff up for abbreviated attire issued them on location. Middle-age-by-then Cliff Robertson (42) and Hugh O'Brian (40) likely spent weeks in gyms or steam room before depart (way) south. Lana Turner would later admit, "I really should have taken a few weeks of training for the role." She is at least caressed with Doris Day-ish filters to make her early 40's seem not so much. As for Edith Head's wardrobe, however, I wouldn't hang most of it on a draft horse.






Heiress LT has a tragic secret that makes her drink too much and be mean to "bought" husband Robertson. She is also horned by that bull after gigolo O'Brian tries a same maneuver in her own marital bed. There was still a Code in 1965, but Love Has Many Faces pushes it all which ways. Pic scribe Marguerite Roberts was lately off HUAC shite-list, gave Love good moments, later would roar back with True Grit and further assignments from Hal Wallis. Director Alexander Singer did few features, mostly TV, as in tons of TV. Supporting cougars-on-prowl (not a known term then) are Ruth Roman and Virginia Grey, their stud hunt ensnaring Hugh and a comparative youth (Ron Husmann) he's tutored to fleece tourists. O'Brian had been Wyatt Earp on television, but was more believable when shifty. He had a face like that, with teeth that could read sharkish (in fact, he wears a shark tooth necklace in LHMF). There was actually a countrywide "Hugh O'Brian Friend Club," chapters in most states (but not North Carolina, which I guess was just us behind the curve again). O'Brian was an interesting guy who gave time to charities and was tireless for visiting troops in Viet Nam. There was also time clocked with pal Hugh Hefner at peak of Playboy debauches (the 70's).






You can get eye-burn just watching Love Has Many Faces (last call for those Riviera Sunglasses!). It especially blisters on HD like TCM ran for their just-ending Lana month. There is fascination in these dinosaurs making 60's way toward extinction. Sobering is virtually all of a cast, so bronzed and healthy then, being gone now. Made me wonder how much longer I get to stay bronzed and healthy. Stephanie Powers is the only one left (oh wait, so is Ron Husmann). There is a weird scene where Powers and Turner face other and strip down, a sort of Here's what I can offer your husband by Steph, and Here's what I've still got to give him, by Lana. LT had to be nervous going into that contest (Powers her junior by almost two decades). I babble on about age because that is what Love Has Many Faces is about. Women fret over how much longer men can be lured, as gigolos ponder their own sell-by date ... all to lovely scoring by David Raksin, which is mainly why I revisit Love Has Many Faces. Raksin got too little work in the 60's, a H'wood agent telling me once that truculence (DR's) was what formed the ice. Had I been a producer, he could have insulted me the live-long day and still scored all my movies.

4 Comments:

Blogger Reg Hartt said...

You are right on David Raksin. I have a series of dvds on film music. He features in many of them. Got THE REDEEMER because he created the score for it. https://books.google.com/books?id=ihaBCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA197&lpg=PA197&dq=david+raksin+mexican+film+on+christ&source=bl&ots=-LD02KV_5-&sig=21M0Xo8ZurorkTMOun1oENp7rDg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiVzaTijK_YAhUD8YMKHfNkBREQ6AEIVzAL#v=onepage&q=david%20raksin%20mexican%20film%20on%20christ&f=false

6:21 AM  
Blogger Joshua said...

While the Hugh O'Brian Friend Club is itself something hard to relate to in contemporary terms, its geographical organization was downright weird. I wonder how much a person in New Jersey could contribute to publicizing the film in Arkansas, Iowa, and Nevada, or how much a person in New York could contribute to publicizing the film in Florida and Missouri.

8:31 PM  
Blogger iarla said...

Its a beautiful looking flick, and a nice record of a lost time and place. Director Singer gave an interview, years later, discussing Lana Turner and the production headaches caused by her drinking. She lived this part. Raksin was a genius. Nancy Wilson, too.

6:49 AM  
Blogger bufffilmbuff said...

Caught LHMF this week on TCM as you did. Never been a fan of Lana Turner... probably the worst actress among the stars of her era. But she did have quite a long career. I would agree that they were doing a dance around the production code throughout. This was near the end of an era where a character could be dying in a hospital after being gored or recover from "turistas" and still show up in bed perfectly coiffed and fully Max Factored. Definitely though a period piece.

11:42 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024