Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Among Cartoon Stars We've Forgot


Columbia's Fox and Crow in Room and Bored (1943)

Columbias were always the rumble seat of cartoon rides. They used to be nowhere, it seemed, but nests are built here and there at You Tube, where better (or worse) ones are accessed, including Room and Bored, a "Fox and Crow" that was among two dozen more/less featuring the mismatched pair that became star attractions, if there was such thing at Columbia during the 40's. Nearest competition there had been "Scrappy," who by 1941 was scrapped. Such vague personages stood as Columbia surrogate for a Bugs or Popeye that ranked higher on marquees and got better rentals. To summarize for many to whom the Fox and Crow are unknown quantity, Fauntleroy Fox was polite, prim, and fussy in oft-role as doormat to brash and streetwise Crawford Crow. The team was minted by Frank Tashlin during his short Columbia stay. Room and Bored has C. Crow as destructive boarder in F. Fox's rooming house. The two were teamed in terms of opposition to each other, and maybe that slowed progress toward a public's embrace, but didn't Tom and Jerry become superstars doing an approximate same thing?


Crawford Crow was new, though familiar somehow, to my cartoon experience, youth exposure having been to Buzzy The Funny Crow of Matty's Funday lineage. All of Columbia we TV-got was Mister Magoo. There were Fox and Crow comic books on spinning racks where I 60's shopped, but these had less lure than even funny bunny stuff that went ignored in favor of Archie, Richie Rich, and eventually Superman/Batman. Come to find lately, however, that Fox and Crow were a comix institution for over twenty years, so someone, many in fact, were loyal. I found Room and Bored fun and would seek more Fox/Crows --- shouldn't Columbia be packaging these for at least On-Demand DVD release? (it could be a two-volume set, in fact) There were lovely IB Technicolor prints made for TV and rental use back in the day. 16mm survivors, splicy/worn as they tend to be, are sought still by collectors loyal to the vanishing format. They'll assure you that Fox/Crows and others bearing Columbia label can only be had on increasingly rare film (this further evidence that digital's takeover is far from complete), and are well worth dedicated search to find them.

8 Comments:

Blogger Dave K said...

Yet Columbia cartoon theatrical re-issues were plentiful as late as the 70's. If a theater bothered to show a cartoon back when disco was king it was a Lantz, DePatie-Freleng or a Columbia. Back in the day I saw ROOM AND BORED in a little Minnesota town as an added attraction to THE OUTLAW JOSIE WALES .

12:57 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Donald Benson looks back at Columbia cartoons on TV:


On KTVU in Oakland, CA we had a long-running kid host, Captain Satellite, who showed Columbias for years: Scrappy, Krazy Kat, Fox & Crow, Li'l Abner, and whatever else was in the pre-UPA package. That was the only place I saw those cartoons until decades later, when a cable network repackaged the color ones.


The Magoos we got on TV weren't the theatricals. That was a syndicated package of cheaper shorts, often focusing on other characters. Frequently they had dim nephew Waldo teamed with a W.C. Fields knockoff named Presley; Bowser the cat (Magoo thought he was a dog) did Tom-and-Jerry schtick with a hamster named Hamlet.


Columbia was evidently making big money with the Stooges shorts, so you'd think the cartoons would coattail onto that success. Since KTVU had a Stooges show immediately after Captain Satellite for many years, it's tempting to think they took the cartoons to get the Stooges. But if that were the case, wouldn't every local station running the Stooges also be running the Columbia cartoons somewhere? Or would it make economic sense to toss those reels in a closet and spend money for the more popular Warner and Famous/Paramount product?

3:50 PM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

I have all these as part of the archive. The prints are decent. The films are better than many lead us to believe. Nice post. Saw them late in life and loved them at once. I have most of the Columbia cartoon output. Definitely worth a look.

4:36 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Dan Mercer contemplates Frank Tashlin's inspiration for the Fox and Crow cartoons:


Is it possible that Frank Tashlin found his inspiration for Fox and Crow in the teaming of Buster Keaton and Jimmy Durante, especially in "Speak Easily!", with Keaton as the shy Professor Post and Durante the street-wise con man leading him astray? Not having seen any of the cartoons, does Crow annoy Fox by constantly pounding him on the arm? Of course, the names "Fauntleroy Fox" and "Crawford Crow" suggest an even odder pairing than Keaton and Durante were, perhaps the crows in "Dumbo" prompting some Jack Benny and Rochester thrown in for flavoring.

To Donald Benson's question about running Fox and Crows with Stooges shorts, that certainly wasn't done in Philadelphia. Local kiddie hostess Sally Starr showed the Stooges on her Channel 6 show and even had Moe make a personal appearance, but if any Fox and Crows accompanied them, they were consigned to a closet. No sense wasting postage, right? Maybe there is some disused storage space at WPVI, the successor to WFIL at Channel 6, with a stack of cannisters waiting for rediscovery.

Either that or a trip to the dumpster.

Daniel

5:12 PM  
Blogger Britt Reid said...

Besides animated cartoons, Fox and Crow had a long run in comic books, beginning with back-up strips in DC's Real Screen Comics and Comic Cavalcade in 1945 to receiving their own title in 1951 for 108 issues ending in 1968!
Reprints occasionally appear in digests and anthologies.

5:33 PM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

Those Durante/Keatons never should have been made. Total misuse of Buster.

9:40 PM  
Blogger Scott MacGillivray said...

I've seen maybe 20 pre-UPA Columbia theatricals so I'm not up on the Fox & Crows except for their longevity. Wasn't the initial inspiration the Tashlin short THE FOX AND THE GRAPES?

Columbia was consulting its cartoon backlog as early as 1956, when Screen Gems offered for TV syndication a pre-packaged, hour-long children's show called "Surprise Package" (later "Surprise Party"). Here's the announcement:

A kid program tentatively labeled "Surprise Package" has 75 one-hour programs. These have special openings and closings. The body of each is made up of a two-reel comedy, a cartoon, and a cliffhanger serial. Two-reelers in "Surprise Package" include such all-time comics as Buster Keaton, Harry Langdon, and Smith and Dale. Some of the serials included are "Brenda Starr," "Deadwood Dick," "Kit Carson," "Secret of Treasure Island," "The Shadow," and "Son of the Guardsman."

I suspect that Screen Gems didn't care much about Columbia's old cartoons because it was making more money with its current Hanna-Barbera cartoons made for television, and sold those more vigorously than the old theatricals.

9:11 AM  
Blogger Michael J. Hayde said...

Regarding Dan Mercer's speculation, it's entirely possible. Tashlin was alleged to have gone to various comedy movies with a notebook to write down gags that appealed to him. I know of one tangible example: in PLANE DAFFY (1944), Homer Pigeon is handed a pistol and told to commit suicide outside the house. The door shuts, we hear the gun go off, and after a pause, Homer pokes his head in and says, "Eh, I missed." That gag was first used in SEE AMERICA THIRST (1930) with Harry Langdon and Slim Summerville.

9:19 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024